Dror Bar Natan, 48, a Jew, and Simoney Topey, 47, a Rastafarian, maintain their religion forbids taking an oath to any person.
Speaking for the government, lawyer Kristina Dragaitis argued the Queen is at the apex of the Constitution and symbolizes the rule of law.
Rosenthal said it would depend on the circumstances.
The appellants, she said, are taking a "literal approach" to the oath.
Justice Peter Lauwers said the appellants seemed to have an "unsophisticated" view of the citizenship oath in maintaining it speaks to their integrity.
"That's not appropriate," Lauwers responded.
The three justices frequently challenged Rosenthal, who pointed to polls showing most Canadians oppose the monarchy.
TORONTO Allowing would be citizens to opt out of a "repugnant" oath to the Queen would cause no harm to anyone and allow them to retain their sense of integrity, Ontario's top court heard Tuesday.
that represents privilege and lack of equality.
In calling for the citizenship oath to be struck down, a trio of longtime permanent residents argued the requirement is discriminatory and violates their religious and conscientious beliefs.
Last September, a lower court judge ruled that any charter violation the oath requirement causes can be justified in a democratic society, prompting the appeal.
"Some people might object to taking any oaths at all on religious grounds," Lauwers said. "Do we do away with all oaths?"
"We have different notions of integrity," Rosenthal said.
Dragaitis said the government was not conceding the oath infringes on religious beliefs.
Native born Canadians do not have to take any oath, hence the argument that permanent residents are discriminated against on the basis of nationality or origin.
and would constrain them from pursuing anti monarchist causes.
"Someone who wants to be a citizen is being forced to say, 'I support the constitutional monarchy,' their lawyer Peter Rosenthal told the Court of Appeal.
Rosenthal insisted that forcing newcomers opposed to the monarchy to pledge allegiance to the Queen makes them hypocrites Air Max For Men Red
Citizenship oath to the Queen 'repugnant
is part of the citizenship oath in which newcomers must promise to be "faithful and bear true allegiance to Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, her heirs and successors."
"How repugnant must that be to someone who's a staunch anti monarchist?"
The trio Israeli, Irish and Jamaican citizens say they would be happy to take an oath to Canada, but not the Queen, who they call a relic Blue Nike Air Max 95
Australia, also a constitutional monarchy like Canada, did away with its pledge to the Queen 20 years ago, the court heard.
The judges noted Air Max Royal Linen Canada is a constitutional monarchy in which freedom to express dissenting views is guaranteed.
"The Queen and the Constitution protects their rights to dissent," Dragaitis said.
At issue Nike 95 Air Max Jd
Michael McAteer, 80, a staunch republican from Ireland, said the oath is unnecessary and would violate his conscience.
Nike Women Running Shoes Blue
Nike Air Max 95 Black Green
Nike Air Max 95 Stussy Blue
Nike Hyperfuse Yellow Air Max
Nike Kobe 11 Mambacurial
Air Max Koston
Hypervenom Light Blue
Nike Air Max 95 Ultra Jacquard White
Air Max Sequent Pink
Air Max Uptempo 3
White Nike Air Max 95 Trainers
Air Max Ultra Moire Grey
Air Max Floral
Air Yeezy Foamposites